考虑地质断层激活后的CO2封存流体泄漏模型及数值分析
Mathematical model and numerical analysis for leakage of fluid along geological fault during CO2 storage
- 2022年第5期 页码:754-763
纸质出版:2022
DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.007
移动端阅览
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
地质断层活化后
流体(CO
2
、盐水、淡水)沿断层泄漏是CO
2
地质封存中不可忽视的关键问题
因此
推导了不同阶段流体沿断层的泄漏速度方程
并结合质量守恒方程和能量守恒方程
建立地质活化断层的CO
2
封存流体泄漏模型
获取了流体沿断层泄漏的关键参数(泄漏时间和泄漏量)。模拟不同参数对流体泄漏时间和泄漏量的影响:随着CO
2
注入速度增快和储层渗透率增大
CO
2
沿断层泄漏的初始时间提前
持续时间延长
泄漏量增加;随着断层渗透率的增加
CO
2
沿断层泄漏的初始时间和持续时间没有变化
而CO
2
泄漏量增加;相较于CO
2
注入速度和储层渗透率
断层渗透率对盐水和淡水泄漏影响最大。综上所述:流体沿断层泄漏的先后顺序为盐水、CO
2
、淡水;流体沿断层泄漏的持续时间由长到短依次为:CO
2
、淡水、盐水;流体沿断层的泄漏量由大到小为CO
2
、盐水、淡水。
The leakage of fluid (CO
2
brine and freshwater) along fault is a crucial issue that cannot be ignored during CO
2
geological storage. For this reason
the equations to describe the fluid leakage rate along faults in different stages are derived. Then
these equations are combined with mass and energy conservation equations to establish the fluid leakage model in CO
2
storage processes by considering geologically activated faults. In su
ch case
the crucial parameters (i.e.
leakage time and leakage amount) for fluid leakage along a fault are obtained. The results of the effects of different parameters on leakage time and amount show the advanced initial time of CO
2
leakage
the extended duration and the increased leakage amount of CO
2
with CO
2
injection rate and reservoir permeability increasing. Meanwhile
the initial time and duration of CO
2
leakage are unchanged while the leakage amount of CO
2
is increased
when increasing the fault permeability. In addition
the fault permeability has the greatest impact on the leakage amount of brine and freshwater
compared to CO
2
injection rate and reservoir permeability. The numerical results show that brine starts to leak earliest
followed by CO
2
freshwater. Meanwhile
the duration of CO
2
leakage along a fault is the longest
while the duration of brine leakage is the shortest. Additionally
the leakage amount of CO
2
is the largest
followed by brine leakage amount and the freshwater leakage amount.
吴秀章, 主编.中国二氧化碳捕集与地质封存首次规模化探索[M].科学出版社,2013.
Lisong Zhang,Shiyan Zhang,Weizhai Jiang,Zhiyuan Wang,Jing Li,Yinghui Bian.A mechanism of fluid exchange associated to CO 2 leakage along activated fault during geologic storage[J].Energy,2018.
Kampman N.,Bickle M.J.,Maskell A.,Chapman H.J.,Evans J.P.,Purser G.,Zhou Z.,Schaller M.F.,Gattacceca J.C.,Bertier P.,Chen F.,Turchyn A.V.,Assayag N.,Rochelle C.,Ballentine C.J.,Busch A..Drilling and sampling a natural CO2 reservoir: Implications for fluid flow and CO2-fluid–rock reactions during CO2 migration through the overburden[J].Chemical Geology,2013.
Matthieu Angeli,Jan Inge Faleide,Roy H. Gabrielsen.Evaluating Seal Quality for Potential Storage Sites in the Norwegian North Sea[J].Energy Procedia,2013.
Chuanhe Lu,Yunwei Sun,Thomas A. Buscheck,Yue Hao,Joshua A. White,Laura Chiaramonte.Uncertainty quantification of CO2 leakage through a fault with multiphase and nonisothermal effects[J].Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology,2012.
Mohammad Javad Shafaei,Jalal Abedi,Hassan Hassanzadeh,Zhangxin Chen.Reverse gas-lift technology for CO 2 storage into deep saline aquifers[J].Energy,2012.
Karsten Pruess.Integrated modeling of CO2 storage and leakage scenarios including transitions between super‐ and subcritical conditions, and phase change between liquid and gaseous CO2[J].Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology,2011.
Ryosuke Aoyagi,Osamu Kitamura,Kenshi Itaoka,Shuzo Igawa,Satoshi Suzuki.Study on role of simulation of possible leakage from geological CO 2 storage in sub-seabed for environmental impact assessment[J].Energy Procedia,2011.
A. Annunziatellis,S.E. Beaubien,S. Bigi,G. Ciotoli,M. Coltella,S. Lombardi.Gas migration along fault systems and through the vadose zone in the Latera caldera (central Italy): Implications for CO 2 geological storage[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2008.
Karsten Pruess.The TOUGH Codes—A Family of Simulation Tools for Multiphase Flow and Transport Processes in Permeable Media[J].Vadose Zone Journal,2004.
Pruess, Karsten.Numerical Simulation of CO2 Leakage From a Geologic Disposal Reservoir, Including Transitions From Super- to Subcritical Conditions, and Boiling of Liquid CO2[J].SPE Journal,2004.
张亚朋,崔龙鹏,刘艳芳,李红伟,王志强,郎子轩.3种典型工业固废的CO_2矿化封存性能[J].环境工程学报,2021(07).
唐凡,朱永刚,张彦明,孟伟,张涛,徐春梅.CO_2注入对储层多孔介质及赋存流体性质影响实验研究[J].石油与天然气化工,2021(01).
宋黎光,赵凤兰,冯海如,王强,娄小康.低渗透油藏渗透率对CO_2驱重力超覆的影响规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2020(04).
田巍.老油田注CO_2开发提高注气能力的方法[J].石油与天然气化工,2020(03).
王志兴,赵凤兰,冯海如,宋黎光,李妍,郝宏达.边水断块油藏水平井组CO_2协同吞吐注入量优化实验研究[J].油气地质与采收率,2020(01).
张大同,滕霖,李玉星,王武昌,胡其会,李顺丽,叶晓,顾帅威.高含CO_2的多相流体系节流效应模型[J].油气储运,2018(10).
张志雄,谢健,戚继红,胡立堂,张可霓,吴礼舟.地质封存二氧化碳沿断层泄漏数值模拟研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2018(02).
夏盈莉,许天福,杨志杰,封官宏,袁益龙,田海龙.深部储层中CO_2沿断层泄漏量的影响因素[J].环境科学研究,2017(10).
高飞,邓存宝,王雪峰,武司苑.采空区煤层封存CO_2影响因素分析[J].环境工程学报,2017(08).
谢健,魏宁,吴礼舟,张可霓,许模.CO_2地质封存泄漏研究进展[J].岩土力学,2017(S1).
胡叶军,王媛,任杰.咸水层封存CO_2沿断层带泄漏的影响因素分析[J].中国科技论文,2016(13).
李小春,袁维,白冰.CO_2地质封存力学问题的数值模拟方法综述[J].岩土力学,2016(06).
胡叶军,王媛,刘阳.深部咸水层二氧化碳沿断层泄漏的运移规律研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015(04).
李毅,张可霓,王笑雨.CO_2地质封存泄漏对浅层地下水影响的分析评价[J].工程勘察,2014(11).
罗二辉,胡永乐,李昭.CO_2地质埋存技术与应用[J].新疆石油天然气,2013(03).
谷丽冰,李治平,侯秀林.二氧化碳地质埋存研究进展[J].地质科技情报,2008(04).
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
苏公网安备32010502011276号