Electricity substitution technology of drilling and completion electrification promote petroleum and gas industry to achieve “carbon peak and neutrality” targets

ZHANG Liehui; ZHANG An’an; CHEN Yi’nan; DING Ning; LI Hai; QU Guanglong; WANG Tao; YAO Shaobin

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.001

Views : 0 下载量: 284 CSCD: 6 CNKI被引量: 8 Scopus: 0 更多指标

PDF
Export
Share
Collection
Album

Electricity substitution technology of drilling and completion electrification promote petroleum and gas industry to achieve “carbon peak and neutrality” targets
Issue 5, Pages: 703-710(2022)
Published：2022
DOI： 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.001
稿件说明：

移动端阅览

DOI：

ZHANG Liehui, ZHANG An’an, CHEN Yi’nan, et al. Electricity substitution technology of drilling and completion electrification promote petroleum and gas industry to achieve “carbon peak and neutrality” targets[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, (5): 703-710. DOI： 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.001.

摘要

近年来

国内外对于油气勘探开发的脱碳化技术愈发重视

油气能源行业结构转型是中国实现“双碳”目标的必然途径之一。为油气行业改革加速实现“双碳”目标

以中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探开发“电代油”技术项目为研究对象

通过剖析油气能源技术的改革方向与路径

对比了项目实施前后在环境污染及能源消耗等方面的变化

着重阐述钻完井电气化改造的必要性及优势。分析并总结了项目实践过程中的重难点

提出了制约“电代油”技术发展的关键技术及未来展开相关研究的突破口

为“双碳”目标下“电代油”技术在油气勘探开发中的应用提供了参考。

Abstract

In recent years

extensive attention has been paid to the decarbonization of petroleum and gas exploration and related technologies at home and broad. The structural transformation of the energy industry of the oil and gas is one of the inevitable ways for China to achieve the “carbon peak and neutrality” targets. Under the prerequisite of energy reform to accelerate the achievement of the targets

the energy reform direction and pathway for the oil and gas technology have been analyzed. Taking the project of the electricity substitution technology in the PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gasfield Company as an example

the changes in terms of environmental pollution and energy consumption before and after the implementation of the project are compared. Then

it focuses on the necessity of the drilling and completion electrification transformation and the advantages of the drilling and completion are emphasized. Based on the analyses and summary of the key and difficulties in the practice process

the key technologies that restrict the development of electricity substitution technology and the breakthrough points of the future researches are put forward

which provides reference for the application of “electricity substitution” technology in oil and gas exploration and development under the “dual-carbon” targets.

关键词

Keywords

references

Stanford University, USA,Canada Energy Regulator, Canada,US Energy Information Administration, USA,Stanford University, USA,Johns Hopkins University, USA,Electric Power Research Institute, USA,Joint Global Change Research Institute, USA,Imperial College London, United Kingdom,Imperial College London, United Kingdom,Canada Energy Regulator, Canada,Environment and Climate Change, Canada,Technical University of Munich, Germany,Canada Energy Regulator, Canada,American University, USA,ESMIA Consultants, Canada,National Energy Technology Laboratory, USA.Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison[J].Energy Policy,2020.

R.G. Papagiannakis,S.R. Krishnan,D.C. Rakopoulos,K.K. Srinivasan,C.D. Rakopoulos.A combined experimental and theoretical study of diesel fuel injection timing and gaseous fuel/diesel mass ratio effects on the performance and emissions of natural gas-diesel HDDI engine operating at various loads[J].Fuel,2017.

Zhang, Ning,Hu, Zhaoguang,Dai, Daihong,Dang, Shuping,Yao, Mingtao,Zhou, Yuhui.Unit Commitment Model in Smart Grid Environment Considering Carbon Emissions Trading[J].IEEE transactions on smart grid,2016.

Dr. Derek Johnson,Robert Heltzel,Dr. Andrew Nix.Trends in Unconventional Well Development—Methane Emissions Associated with the Use of Dual Fuel and Dedicated Natural Gas Engines[J].Energy Technology,2014.

Karel Kellens,Wim Dewulf,Michael Overcash,Michael Z. Hauschild,Joost R. Duflou.Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: Methodology description[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2012.

邢洁,宋男哲,李婉婷,李草青青.基于STIRPAT模型的黑龙江省“十四五”期间碳强度目标研究[J].环境科学与管理,2021(08).

贺甲元,程洪,向红,翟晓鹏,耿宇迪,王海波.塔河油田碳酸盐岩储层暂堵转向压裂排量优化[J].石油钻采工艺,2021(02).

刘志强,宋朝阳,程守业,洪文浩,荆国业,李新华,王来所,赵钧羡.我国反井钻机钻井技术与装备发展历程及现状[J].煤炭科学技术,2021(01).

杨宇,于宏源,鲁刚,王礼茂,赵媛,郝丽莎,任东明,方伟,安海忠,蔡国田.世界能源百年变局与国家能源安全[J].自然资源学报,2020(11).

罗佐县.碳中和激活多领域天然气需求潜力[J].能源,2020(11).

张健,周霞,刘旭,赵猛,张钦钦,黑亮.机械钻机电代油节能减排效果测试方法研究[J].钻采工艺,2020(05).

童征,展恩强,刘颖,刘军,李益良,杨震,王春河.国内电驱压裂经济性和制约因素分析[J].国际石油经济,2020(07).

张斌,李磊,邱勇潮,戴启平,李双鹏,邓友超.电驱压裂设备在页岩气储层改造中的应用[J].天然气工业,2020(05).

权春锋.柴油机尾气处理技术发展分析[J].汽车实用技术,2020(08).

郭尊,李庚银,周明.计及碳交易机制的电–气联合系统快速动态鲁棒优化运行[J].电网技术,2020(04).

韩勇,任艳辉,张悦,孔利剑.石油钻井机械“电代油”配套技术研究[J].中国设备工程,2020(04).

蒋合艳,陆俊康,武卫卫,刘江,刘虎.电驱动钻机气控系统的优化设计[J].液压气动与密封,2019(11).

孙惠娟,蒙锦辉,彭春华.风–光–水–碳捕集多区域虚拟电厂协调优化调度[J].电网技术,2019(11).

翁琳,陈剑波.光伏系统基于全生命周期碳排放量计算的环境与经济效益分析[J].上海理工大学学报,2017(03).

肖潇,肖溢.中国的海外能源战略差异化研究——以中东和东盟LNG进口为例[J].科技经济市场,2016(05).

朱发根,单葆国,马丁,刘小聪,李江涛.基于CO_2减排目标的2050年全球能源需求展望[J].中国电力,2016(03).

王彤,李丹,李春秋.油田钻机驱动“以电代油”的应用及效益[J].电力需求侧管理,2014(05).

帅石金,唐韬,赵彦光,华伦.柴油车排放法规及后处理技术的现状与展望[J].汽车安全与节能学报,2012(03).

王京龙.气体钻井安全监控系统在胜利油田的应用[J].中小企业管理与科技(下旬刊),2011(06).

王代华,万小宏,李国孝,康涛.电驱动钻机控制系统配置方案探讨[J].石油机械,2001(09).

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

暂无数据